patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!
Local Voices
Read more on www.GreenBusinessMatters.com

10 Sustainable New Year's Resolutions for Businesses

1) Ask employees to turn off their computers when they are away from work. According to the U.S. Department of Energy, users can save energy by turning off monitors that won’t be used for 20 minutes and CPUs that won’t be used for two hours. In case you’re wondering, computers with the very best power-down features still use 30 percent of the power that they use when in normal operation.

2) Pay employees a living wage. Much attention has been paid of late to fair trade issues, which are couched almost exclusively in terms of international commerce, but the basic tenants are applicable to domestic workers as well. By paying employees well enough that they can afford to live, employers will lower attrition rates and improve productivity, thereby recovering a portion of the additional cost. The Society for Human Resource Management has a turnover cost calculator that may help employers determine how much they could save by decreasing attrition.

3) Ban bottled water at work. Plastic water bottles are the epitome of waste.  Enticing people to buy bottled water might just be the greatest marketing coup of all time. Do you realize that water costs $5.33 per gallon when purchased in 12 oz. bottles priced at $0.50 each? And we think gasoline is expensive! The worst part is that bottled water is often less pure than tap water. If employees complain about chlorine taste in water, install a filter on your tap.

4) Ban space heaters at work. Although employees may be tempted to use electric space heaters to keep warm, they are a bad idea for several reasons. They are often left on when offices are vacant and may be used to raise the temperature above what is really needed. Furthermore, they use 1,500 watts of electricity, making them prone to overloading standard 15-amp circuits. And they are a common cause of fires. Consider issuing fleeces with corporate logos to workers to help them keep warm.

5) Encourage recycling. Many communities have single-stream recycling available for residences, but still lack recycling for commercial properties. Nonetheless, recycling generally saves money because it can reduce dumpster tipping fees by an amount greater than the cost of having recycling hauled away. Try placing a recycling bin next to every trash can in your workplace and explain why it’s important to make the effort. Recycling one 12 oz. aluminum can saves enough electricity to power a TV for three hours.

6) Consider allowing flexible work schedules. By allowing employees to vary their work hours, employers can benefit in many ways. Higher employee morale will increase creativity and productivity. By avoiding the peak rush hours, employees’ commuting costs may be reduced and their quality of life improved. Often employees granted flex time will be better able to balance their work and personal lives, leading to better attendance and fewer distractions at work.

7) Offer healthier snacks to employees. Consider substituting several healthy choices in snack vending machines. Typical snacks are great for taste buds and horrible for the rest of the human body. They are full of simple sugars, salt and cholesterol. Try replacing the least popular items with nuts, dried fruits and trans-fat-free, whole-grain crackers.

8) Hold virtual meetings. Airline travel is the least energy-efficient form of transportation, yet it is often used by business travelers. Often business representatives fly to distant cities simply to attend a meeting. Now that free, internet-based video conferencing tools, including Skype, have evolved to a point where the meeting experience is quite satisfactory, it makes less sense to travel. Save time, money and the environment by staying put more often.

9) Inspire your customers with incentives. Offer discounts to clients who have demonstrated green achievements. Programs of this sort have a two-fold benefit; they position the sponsoring company as a leader in sustainability, and it inspires customers to go out and do good things.

10) Say no to polystyrene. Every year, Americans throw away 25 billion polystyrene (Styrofoam) cups. Benzene, a known carcinogen, is used to make Styrofoam. When stored or heated, Styrofoam may leach the possible human carcinogen styrene into foods, according to www.ehow.com. Most polystyrene products end up in landfills where they will never decompose. Many firms are establishing their facilities as polystyrene-free zones where cups, lunch trays, packing peanuts and plates are banned. Alternatives to Styrofoam include paper food containers and biodegradable eating utensils made from corn and sugar.

Happy New Year!

This article first appeared on www.GreenBusinessMatters.com

H.R. Pufnstuf

9:58 am on Sunday, January 1, 2012

#2 seems really dumb. Can you please give an example of an employer who does not pay employees a living wage? And, if there is one, why don't the employees seek work elsewhere? And if the employees do seek work elsewhere, what's wrong with that? And if that's their only option for employment, are they better off making some money or no money?

You seem to have almost no grasp of supply and demand at all.

Reply
Comment_arrow

oldtwnlaurel

8:50 pm on Monday, January 2, 2012

A living wage is the minimum hourly income necessary for a worker to meet basic needs, such as sufficient shelter, healthy food, and medical care. It differs from the minimum wage in that it varies according to the cost of living in an area and a minimum wage is simply the lowest allowed by law. Only a very few companies offer living wages, and they have a finite number of jobs do to filling specific areas in the market. In other words, there are only so many jobs that (say) Lowes can fill. In other words, I may want to get a job at a place that pays a living wage, but am stuck getting any work I can. I then am reduced to purchasing cheep, but not particularly nourishing food (leading to the stupid Fat Poor People jokes conservatives have taken to making), reduced housing options (including living in my car), and not being able to get any healthcare beyond, maybe a minuet clinic and OTC meds.
Your argument lends itself to a justification of wage slavery, ie: it's better for the peasantry to make some money than none at all. Since you have always come off as an objectivist shill, that is unsurprising. You and social darwinism seem to go hand in hand.

Comment_arrow

H.R. Pufnstuf

10:09 pm on Monday, January 2, 2012

Oldpwndlaurel- if it's true that only a few companies offer living wages, is it logically true then that most people are living in poverty? That is verifiably false.

I think some people in this country need a lesson in what poverty is. Unfortunately, thanks to our bi-partisan national debt and Keynesian spending orgy, that lesson is going to come.

Frank Hazzard

12:44 pm on Sunday, January 1, 2012

Hi, Ohai,

I agree it may seem dumb at first glance. However there are examples of companies that pay slightly higher wages and benefit from doing so. Wegmans and Lowes come to mind. Here is the rationale for paying higher wages:
1) It's hard for people to live on minimum wage.
2) Minimum wage workers tend to move from job to job because there is little incentive to stay at a minimum wage job.
3) There are costs related to attrition that are lessened if workers stay longer at jobs.

Reply
Comment_arrow

H.R. Pufnstuf

4:39 pm on Sunday, January 1, 2012

Now you're moving the goal posts- first you had said paying a "living wage", whatever that is, and now you're saying a "slightly higher wage". Minimum wage is not necessarily for people to live on, but if they choose to do so by not acquiring marketable skills, that's on them. Really, the minimum wage should be eliminated. It's basically a law that says that employers MUST discriminate against people with low job skills. Furthermore, I don't see why you think it's a problem that low wage workers move from job to job. Each time they move, they are presumably making themselves better off. Don't you agree? Companies, like the rest of us, will do what's in their best interest. If paying a higher wage makes economic sense, they'll do it. But I can't imagine that attrition costs are very high for low skilled jobs.

Comment_arrow

oldtwnlaurel

8:56 pm on Monday, January 2, 2012

Ohai, your lack of understanding real economics, rather than your "market driven" flights of fantasy only illustrate why we have ended up where we are. People tend to change jobs because of child care needs or because a job has cut back on their hours, not because they are moving up the ladder.

Comment_arrow

H.R. Pufnstuf

9:52 pm on Monday, January 2, 2012

oldpwnedlaurel- we ended up where we are as a nation because we were too market driven? You're too funny! I think we have the two party scam in DC to thank for that.

http://dailycapitalist.com/2011/11/03/capitalism-death-by-a-thousand-cuts/

And if people are changing jobs because their hours were cut back, do you think it's likely that their employers can afford to pay them more? Do you even think these things through at all? And the reason childcare is so expensive is because of government regulation. Go research the laws and regulations involved in starting a child daycare- it's enough to make your head explode.

Comment_arrow

oldtwnlaurel

11:16 pm on Monday, January 2, 2012

Ohai: That we reduced everything to the false god of the "Market." We, as a society, reduced people to resources to be exploited. the Objectivists who created this mess in the 80's and 90's are now closing the noose to reduce the American populace to serfdom, all in the name of squeezing a few more dollars out. Blaming the governments attempts at assuring safety just shows your bias: Poor people don't need help, they need to be crushed. You're a fool and a tool. I hope that your Neo-Feudalism keeps you warm at night once the forces you cheerlead turn on you and you end up in penury since it will be "for your own good."

Comment_arrow

H.R. Pufnstuf

7:46 am on Tuesday, January 3, 2012

The objectivists who created this mess in the 80s and 90s (I assume you mean Reagan and Bush I who were not objectivists but whatever) and who are apparently still in charge somehow to "close the noose"? Really, blaming Ayn Rand? You have a screwy worldview.

Governments have done anything but attempt to assure safety. Look at Social Security. That is a ticking timebomb that will harm millions of people. If a private company started that Ponzi, every executive involved would be in the slammer. Blame Wall Street if you want, but the real culprits are down in DC.

O.P. Ditch

7:34 am on Monday, January 2, 2012

Wait.... Did I see this list somewhere before???? oh oh oh, I know, it was on a sign at the failed Occupy Ellicott City event!, or was it Occupy Wall Street? he he he.

Reply

Leave a comment