patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!
Local Voices
Martin O'Malley is the Governor of Maryland. He writes a regular blog for his official website.

We Can Reduce Gun Violence Without Infringing on Law Abiding Gun Owners’ Rights

By Stacy Mayer, Chief Legislative Officer

Gun safety experts, as well as most Marylanders, agree that these are common sense steps we can take to keep families safe and reduce gun violence in Maryland. Nevertheless, there are some, including gun manufacturers, who will oppose any and all efforts to put safety measures in place. They will use scare tactics and misinformation in order to stir up fear and generate opposition to the Governor’s initiatives.

Let me set the record straight:

(1)  Our Gun Safety Proposals Are Not Aimed At Hunters and Sportsmen. The Governor understands and respects the traditions of hunters and sportsmen in Maryland. That’s why we explicitly carve out shotguns and rifles from the licensing requirements of our bill.

(2)  Our Gun Safety Proposals Would Not Ban Handguns. The bill would not prevent law-abiding Marylanders who want to purchase a handgun to protect themselves or their families from doing so. Our goal is to prevent criminals from getting guns by using straw purchasers, so the bill creates certain licensing requirements for purchasing a handgun. But law-abiding citizens would still be permitted to purchase and own handguns.

(3)  Our Gun Safety Proposals Are Consistent with the Constitution. Maryland’s Attorney General analyzed the proposals and determined that they are “constitutional under the Second Amendment,” that “law-abiding gun owners have nothing to fear,” and that our proposals “do not allow for confiscation of guns nor could they” under Supreme Court precedent.http://www.oag.state.md.us/Press/2013/012913.html

The lobbyists for the gun manufacturers want to preserve the status quo and block even common sense gun safety measures. They will spread falsehoods in order to create unwarranted fear. Know the facts: the licensing requirements don’t affect shotguns and rifles, we don’t ban handguns, and the proposals are consistent with the Constitution.

For more information on the bill, clock on the PDF above.

This blog is posted on 49 sites throughout Maryland. Join the statewide conversation in comments! Find other Patch sites here.

Sanchez

4:54 pm on Wednesday, February 6, 2013

"” and that our proposals “do not allow for confiscation of guns nor could they” under Supreme Court precedent."

Flat out LIE by this habitual liar!

" A PERSON WHO LAWFULLY POSSESSED AN ASSAULT LONG GUN OR A COPYCAT WEAPON BEFORE OCTOBER 1, 2013, AND WHO REGISTERS THE ASSAULT LONG GUN OR COPYCAT WEAPON WITH THE SECRETARY OF STATE POLICE BEFORE NOVEMBER 1, 2013, MAY:
(I) CONTINUE TO POSSESS THE ASSAULT LONG GUN OR COPYCAT WEAPON; OR
(II) WHILE CARRYING A COURT ORDER REQUIRING THE SURRENDER OF THE ASSAULT LONG GUN OR COPYCAT WEAPON, TRANSPORT THE ASSAULT LONG GUN OR COPYCAT WEAPON DIRECTLY TO THE LAW ENFORCEMENT UNIT, BARRACKS, OR STATION IF THE PERSON HAS NOTIFIED THE LAW ENFORCEMENT UNIT, BARRACKS, OR STATION THAT THE PERSON IS TRANSPORTING THE ASSAULT LONG GUN OR COPYCAT WEAPON IN ACCORDANCE WITH A COURT ORDER AND THE ASSAULT LONG GUN OR COPYCAT WEAPON IS UNLOADED.

"A law enforcement unit may seize as contraband and dispose of according to regulation an assault [pistol] WEAPON transported, sold, transferred, purchased, received, or possessed in violation of this subtitle."

CONFISCATION if the licensing scheme is not followed. Since when do we license our basic Constitutional rights? Will we require a license to freely speak?

What SHOULD be passed is MUST CARRY laws in Martyland.

Reply

Sanchez

4:54 pm on Wednesday, February 6, 2013

And O'Malley, the same bill makes the transfer or sale of restricted firearms and magazines over 10 rounds a crime. That effectively renders citizens restricted firearms worthless and therefore a violation of the 5th Amendment. A Government TAKING.

Reply

Sanchez

4:54 pm on Wednesday, February 6, 2013

The Saturday Night ban of the 90's didn't work.
The Firearm Safety Act of 2000 didn't work.
The Firearm Safety Act of 2013 will one day not be enough for these radical hoplophobes.

Reply

Greg

4:54 pm on Wednesday, February 6, 2013

Where do your stats , that most Marylanders agree, come from and where can they be proven. I can say most US citizens disagree!
The 2nd amendment wasn't written for hunting and sportsman, it was written to keep the government of "The People" in check!!!! Uphold the current laws that are on the books and stop taking advantage of a terrible situation like Newtown!!! The family and friends all new there were problems with this particular individual but decided to do nothing about it !! Just las all the family and friends of all the other nut cases that commit these cowardly acts of violence!!!!!!!!!!!

Reply

amark

1:49 am on Thursday, February 7, 2013

I love how when liberals propose restrictions on freedom or expansion of government, they are always called "commonsense measures". This mouthpiece for Owe'malley is wrong on all counts:

1. The second amendment is not about hunters. The anti gun lobby always throws out this red herring to gain support for their ideas. Hunters absolutely have the right to own rifles for sport as do law abiding citizens to own other guns to defend their homes, families, business, property, etc.

2. Oh that's nice they don't "ban" handguns. Isn't that sweet of them. But this bill would make it much more difficult to own one by imposing a $100 fee in addition to the laws that are already on the book. That of course does nothing to stop criminals from getting them as she claims here.

3. It is constitutional? LOL. Only if you are iliterate and don't understand the phrase "shall not be infringed". And we are supposed to care that the anti gun AG Gansler believes it is constitutional? LMAO.

We pay the salary of propogandists like this women to push the leftist agenda of Martin Owe'malley. I could think of a lot better use of taxpayers dollars.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Susan Beehler

4:25 pm on Thursday, February 7, 2013

"This women" I am sick and tired of "guys" acting like their "guns" are their manhood. Get a grip, the boogeyman is not coming for your gun or are they quick check under your bed.

Comment_arrow

amark

4:23 pm on Friday, February 8, 2013

First maam (sorry if that term offends you as it does a lot of feminists) I don't know how saying "this woman" is so outrageous. Is she a woman? Yes. Second are you not being sexist by referring to guys and manhood? How dare you not respect me, LOL.

Evelyn Helvey

1:30 pm on Thursday, February 7, 2013

Remember this: Universal gun registration will lead to universal gun confiscation. All these recent mass shootings have been done by mentally ill shooters not by law abiding citizens. Our politicians should focus on that. I don't trust the government when they start this banning of certain weapons--that will not reduce crime and only opens the door for further regulations to take guns away from the people. Watch how your politicians vote on these issues and, in turn, vote accordingly

Reply
Comment_arrow

Susan Beehler

4:25 pm on Thursday, February 7, 2013

Is this how registering our cars has led to confiscation? Is this how filing a deed to your house has led to confiscation? Is this how filing a marriage licence has led to your spouse being confiscated? Please go on with your irrational fear and they may have you labeled "mentally ill" and you will have your gun confiscated. Your choice register or be label "mentally ill". Think about it, what will you choose. Which is more subjective; a gun or "mentally ill"?

Comment_arrow

Native

12:12 am on Monday, February 11, 2013

Susan; cars, deeds, & marriage are not rights enumerated in the constitution. The right to bear arms is, & is being trampled by democrats.

Goodaye

11:58 am on Friday, February 8, 2013

I'm sure the citizens of the United Kingdom and Australia said the same thing!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Steve

12:52 pm on Friday, February 8, 2013

"I'm sure the citizens of the United Kingdom and Australia said the same thing!"

NRA perpetuated Myths.

Comment_arrow

1ke

4:23 pm on Friday, February 8, 2013

The very last thing on the mind of any citizen of the UK is owning a gun. Have you ever been there? Is anybody in you family from there?

Comment_arrow

Chris W

11:29 am on Monday, February 11, 2013

Wow. You must have the pulse of the nation. You know what everyone in England is thinking. Bravo.

BFM

11:58 am on Friday, February 8, 2013

Susan, your statements are foolish. Please try to do better.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sanchez

12:21 pm on Friday, February 8, 2013

I think we found the mentally ill !!!!

Comment_arrow

Buck Harmon

12:12 am on Monday, February 11, 2013

What Susan wrote must be read several times slowly...what she's attempting to say here is actually very interesting...there are days when thoughts are difficult to put into words I suppose..

CP

12:52 pm on Friday, February 8, 2013

Liberals just hate America.

Reply
Comment_arrow

amark

4:23 pm on Friday, February 8, 2013

You cannot be a liberal and support the Constitution of the United States. That's why they have such contempt for it.

f250 redneck

4:23 pm on Friday, February 8, 2013

Tell me OWE Malley what about all the guns the criminals have. What are you going to do about them. Add up all the homicides that are committed by these criminals and I am sure most of them are drug related and compare that to law abiding citizens who have guns, who sir has committed the most murders. Tell me. OI think criminals. If you bring back the death penalty for murders committed I am sure with DNA testing and the technology we have now we can be accurate on who has committed the crime. Put the murders to death instead of free housing,food,tv,etc. How will you get them to abide by the law you won't.

Reply

Kevin1845

4:23 pm on Friday, February 8, 2013

It is amazing all those worried about a requirement to have a license to own an assault weapon. There is very little different in the amount carnage you can cause with a full auto assault weapon and a semi auto assault weapon yet you are required by law to register a fully auto assault weapon. The argument that citizens need assault weapons to protect themselves from the government is a joke a best. Do yourself a favor and read the history of Ruby Ridge, Waco, and The Move Organization. What good is you assault weapon when the government deploys sniper teams, bulldozers, and helicopters?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sanchez

11:58 pm on Sunday, February 10, 2013

"The argument that citizens need assault weapons to protect themselves from the government is a joke a best."

It's even funnier that people still make the argument that this foolish meme is the reason we are against any new gun laws.

Comment_arrow

Dan Blasberg

11:58 pm on Sunday, February 10, 2013

Kevin - there is a huge difference in the amount of damage that can be caused by a fully automatic firearm and a semi-automatic firearm. I have yet to see anyone pull a trigger multiple times with a semi-automatic firearm and even come close to the rate of fire of a fully automatic firearm.

Since "assault weapons" are so evil, why is DHS using the term "personal defense weapons" in a bid request to purchase 7000 fully automatic M4 battle rifles? https://www.fbo.gov/?s=opportunity&mode=form&id=d791b6aa0fd9d3d8833b2efa08300033&tab=core&_cview=0

The above description and request for bid is for actual assault weapons, the AR platform that many firearms owners are actually personal defense weapons or even sporting rifles.

1ke

12:13 am on Monday, February 11, 2013

What makes any of you believe that there is an solid conservative bloc that is committed to assault weapon/large clip/handgun ownership? Just because you find foaming-at-the-mouth support here in this space does not mean that it is universal

Reply
Comment_arrow

AG

11:29 am on Monday, February 11, 2013

1ke - you are speaking from a position of ignorance. Before you mouth off, learn what you are talking about. What is a "large clip"? This shows you are just reading off of O'Malley's talking point memo. LOL

RW Willy

12:13 am on Monday, February 11, 2013

Kevin, it is when the snipers, bulldozer operators and spilots realize that their Government is out of control that your constitutionally guaranteed right to bear arms becomes relavent.
As for everyone else who likes the SB 281, please read it.
If it passes it will end ALL junior hunting and ALL firearm training for everyone under 21. That is huge. How will this stop a mass murder?

Reply

RW Willy

12:13 am on Monday, February 11, 2013

Maybe some of the regular leftwing trolls can give us the number of instances were a lawfully purchased weapon (any type of firearm) is used in a crime?

Reply

Native

12:12 am on Monday, February 11, 2013

Oh please. It has been proven that none of the "officials" that have shown up to the town halls & proposed bill discussions have any idea what is even in them. Even the poll numbers are suspect since the questions aren't divulged. The record high numbers of pro second amendment supporters that have attended the townhalls & were in Annapolis the other day really took the administration by surprise. This whole charade is nothing more then feel good, kneejerk reactions that try to take advantage of a tragedy, in order to further the elimination of the God given rights of gun owners.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Steve

1:06 pm on Monday, February 11, 2013

LOL "Newsmax" Now you have have posted the same non event from the Neocon Trinity. World Nut Drooly, The Blaze and Newsmax.

Steve

12:12 am on Monday, February 11, 2013

Mobster Whitey Bulger bought 10 pistols and a shotgun using the Gun Show loophole while he was on the run.

http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2013/02/08/Bulger-used-loophole-to-purchase-guns/UPI-81691360334180/

How in the world can a person on the FBI's Most Wanted list do this? Why don't the Gun Nutters have a problem with this?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Chris W

11:29 am on Monday, February 11, 2013

And that is a great example of why the gun show loophole must be closed. However, that should not overreach and get involved in all private sales.

Comment_arrow

AG

6:38 pm on Monday, February 11, 2013

The FBI has shown that only 1% of the guns used in crime come from gun shows or legal purchases where a background check was not done. I do not believe a sweeping change that will cost $$$ and will have very little effect is a good idea. Even if you can come up with a second example of abuse would I want to spend all the money.

You and I both know that if Bulger could not have bought the guns at a gun show, he would have found an illegal way to acquire the weapons.

But the liberal way of solving problems like this is to spend first, think later....

Sanchez

11:58 pm on Sunday, February 10, 2013

Mayor O'Malley supported the FSA of 2000 and its "ballistic fingerprinting" law but how has it worked out? How many more useless ineffective laws do we need?

Reply
Comment_arrow

AG

6:38 pm on Monday, February 11, 2013

And how much has it cost the citizens of Maryland?

Hays

11:58 pm on Sunday, February 10, 2013

According to FBI statistics, Maryland suffered 398 homicide during 2011. Of these, 272 were firearm related. Only two were caused by rifles of any kind. These numbers are in concert with those found nationally. The same 2011 statistics reveal 323 murders in the United States that year by rifles of any kind, including the much-maligned "assault weapon." This despite the fact that millions of these are owned and used by law-abiding American hunters, shooters, and collectors. Perhaps your "common sense" solutions are geared more to simple control rather than to crime control.

What "assault weapon" problem exists, other than the problem caused by the spreading of disinformation? If the legislation is passed, what benefit will result? How much will crime be decreased? If unsuccessful, what is the next step?

Molon labe

Reply

A question

11:58 pm on Sunday, February 10, 2013

The turnout in Annapolis Feb 6th was genuine grassroots people taking time off from work to support personal beliefs. The NRA piggybacked on this event. Maryland is so blue the NRA has rarely intervened in this state.

Why was the MD shooting website hit by Denial of Service attacks the day before?.

Why is the MD anti gun origination filled with people that are known to use astroturf at rallies?

SB281 makes it illegal for people under 21 to possess ammunition. How does this not stop hunters? Yes, say whatever to divide the other side.

The original date of the hearings were Feb 8th. Why was it changed?

Why did Senator Frosh prevent pro gun people from testifying at the hearings? What will you say when he disagrees with your views and bullys the hearing into denying you the chance to speak your piece.

Reply

Chris W

11:29 am on Monday, February 11, 2013

"Our Gun Safety Proposals Would Not Ban Handguns."

Translation: our legislation will have no effect on crime.

So called "Assault weapons" are used in less than two percent of all gun crime. The bottom line is when they are done, and nothing changes, that will be the excuse to clamp down even more.

There is a very simple solution to gun crime. Free non-violent drug offenders and decriminalize or legalize drugs, minimum 10 year sentence for anyone convicted of a violent crime involving gun use, mandatory life in prison for second offense.

Reply
Comment_arrow

amark

1:06 pm on Monday, February 11, 2013

Chris W that plan makes too much sense. And it would not allow the "progressives" to be able to use the issue for political purposes.

amark

11:29 am on Monday, February 11, 2013

I see the leftists steve and 1ke have appeared on this thread to spout the democrat talking points.

Reply

Steve

11:29 am on Monday, February 11, 2013

LOL It wasn't grassroots at all. It was as organized as any other protest in Annapolis. Senator Frosh didn't prevent anybody from testifying at the hearings. He gave an alternating hour to each side to testify.

Reply

Hammbone

1:06 pm on Monday, February 11, 2013

1st
I hunt with a "Assault Weapon" .
I have torn rotator cuff so I needed something with less recoil. My wife bought me an R-25 for my 50th Birthday. It is the AR-15 in a 308 caliber.
I know a lot of people that hunt with the AR Platform , so don't say "Hunters don't use it"
2nd
less that 2% of all gun crime. Most are done with hand guns (including sandy hook).
Why are we not going after Hollywood?
The junk that is on TV is unreal. Even the commercials during prime time family hrs !

Reply

Maryellen Brady

8:16 pm on Saturday, February 16, 2013

In depth thorough back ground checks as intended instead of weakened by the military industrial comples stooges, other wise known as the NRA. What would have thought that an organization supposing representing millions of "responsible gun owners" would lobby to cripple the ATF from enforcing laws on the books or stifle technology development to do comprehensive background checks in just minutes. Close the gun show loopholes, ban high capacity magazines and military grade weapons. Over 11,000 deaths to gun violence each year in US. Most of those dying are innocent victims: children, abused spouses and dumb accidents: like the father who chased armed intruder and then turned around and accidentally killed his son, just this week.

Reply
Comment_arrow

amark

11:20 am on Sunday, February 17, 2013

If you learned to write coherently, I might take you seriously. Well with your left wing anti gun, anti constitutional views, I probably wouldn't.

Comment_arrow

Hays

11:20 am on Sunday, February 17, 2013

Maryellen,
What is the "gunshow loophole?" What are "military grade weapons?" How many deaths are attributable annually to this type of weapon, to the extent it even exists? (I can tell you that the FBI says in 2011 323 deaths were caused by rifles of any sort.) What specific results should we expect from the passage of your proposed legislation? Do you have any actual knowledge or are you merely parroting the suggestions of others?

Comment_arrow

AG

11:20 am on Sunday, February 17, 2013

This is one of the most uninformed comments I have seen posted. Maryellen, if you really cared about children you would focus on swimming pool safety. Put your tin foil hat back on and spend your time looking for UFO's. OMG, this would take a lot of time to go through all the fallacies in your logic

Comment_arrow

amark

10:00 pm on Monday, February 18, 2013

Also most of the 11k deaths are not the people you list. They are generally those involved in crime, gangs and the drug trade. The logic of morons like Owe'malley and BH Obama saying "if we can save just one life it is worth it" is stupid. By that logic we should ban cars.

Comment_arrow

AG

12:47 pm on Tuesday, February 19, 2013

Maryellen Brady - Do you know how many guns purchased at gun shows are used in crime? Did you know Maryland does not allow purchases in gun shows? That is why crime is so low in Baltimore. Why do you think you know what is best for the people in Texas.

You are a pretty arrogant to demand laws be passed to change the laws in a state that is over 1,500 miles away from the crooked state of Maryland. How would you feel if the people of Texas demanded Maryland change their laws.

Comment_arrow

AG

11:20 am on Sunday, February 17, 2013

How about having O'Malley lower MD tax rates to be as low as Colorado? And, by law, any excess tax collected must be returned to the citizens. And taxes cannot be raised faster than inflation or population growth.

Plus, Colorado has a great concealed carry law and is an OPEN CARRY state.

Finally, any politician who votes for this and is not from Denver will be out of a job in the next election.

The people of Colorado, outside of Denver - and unlike anyone in Maryland, are very independent people who hate government intrusion in their lives.

MsDivine

12:47 pm on Tuesday, February 19, 2013

We DON'T Blame cars for drunk drivers, so why blame guns for violent people.

Reply

Democrat

9:26 pm on Sunday, February 24, 2013

As an executive member of MSI I would like to say thank you to all of you that have sent emails, written letters, attended hearing&rally's, spoke with your representatives and given testimony against these anti liberty, anti gun, anti self-defense proposed laws. We are at the height of this battle and entering the most important moment. We have heard repeatedly from numerous citizens, officers and delegates that they are with us, and your efforts do matter. The vast majority of us want law abiding citizens to continue to enjoy firearms and possess them for self-defense. There are only a few anti-gun politicians that are led by Gov O'malley, that do not respect our great American gun history and want to take all guns away. We can stop them, but we need every voice. If you have not already heard, the most terrible anti-gun bill SB281 has made it out of the State Senate Judiciary Committee and is now going to be voted on by the full Senate. Please take a few minutes to call your district representative and ask them to not pass ANY gun control bill. They are listening, they are counting voices, we need your help right now.

This is a wonderful and uplifting news conference by the Center for Urban Renewal and Education (CURE):

http://www.urbancure.org/mbarticle.asp?id=290&t=Blacks-speak-out-against-gun-control#.USgBCR9i4AY.email

Reply
Comment_arrow

amark

7:35 pm on Thursday, February 28, 2013

And all the liberals will have no problem attending as they do not have jobs to worry about going to.

Comment_arrow

Native

7:35 pm on Thursday, February 28, 2013

yeah, about that...I guarantee the size of that group consisting of grassroots, there-on-their-own, individuals, won't come close to the size of the pro 2A group there recently. Because, there will be union members that were paid to be bused in, school kids used as props, & others that don't have a clue what they are protesting or supporting.

Leave a comment