BLOG: Perry Hall Deserves County Dog Park Funding

Why no county funding for Perry Paw Dog Park?

This blog post is in response to a post from the Perry Paw Dog Park committee requesting county funding for development. 

I do not understand the funding issue for the Perry Paw Dog Park. When I first heard about it, I was excited to get a place close by for my puppy. I was surprised that it was up to the community to raise funds for it, but at the time I was unaware that other communities received county funds. Why does Perry Hall have to raise so much money for our dog park while the county has funded other communities' parks? Obviously dog parks aren't the most important item in strained budgets, but how can the county ignore us? I pay a lot in taxes for the privilege of living in this community and I don't think it's unreasonable to expect the county to provide the same amenities to Perry Hall as other communities in the county!

This post is contributed by a community member. The views expressed in this blog are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Patch Media Corporation. Everyone is welcome to submit a post to Patch. If you'd like to post a blog, go here to get started.

You February 14, 2013 at 01:29 PM
BTW. I do agree that the cost of this dog park is absurd! Take away the stupid key code opener and security system and high tech crap. Build two basic fenced in areas and a few garbage cans.
Donna McDonough February 14, 2013 at 02:11 PM
I agree about the electronic devices. All people really need is a place for dogs to be able to run free and play safely. Some things are definitely over developed. And speaking of schools, and rec centers, they are different, albeit all quality of life issues. Perry Hall is a place where people come for the high quality schools, low crime, and sense of community that is not always available in other areas. We need county funding to maintain that. I teach in Baltimore county, and have been in both air conditioned and non air conditioned schools. And believe me, both have pluses and minuses. Schools are funded differently than dog parks, as they should be. Careful consideration should be taken for all spending, it just needs to be fair.
DGAF February 14, 2013 at 02:29 PM
Evets your a tool
Paul Amirault February 14, 2013 at 03:45 PM
Donna, you state that "All people really need is a place for dogs to be able to run free and play safely.". The purpose of controlling access to the Dog Park is exactly that. Only registered members who have agreed to the rules of the Dog Park, proven their dogs are properly vaccinated and licensed will have access to the Dog Park. Although it may sound like a luxury to some, it is actually a necessity to control who uses the park. The proposed park is nearly two acres with about 1,500 feet of six foot high fencing. The fencing is by far the most significant portion of the cost.
Donna McDonough February 14, 2013 at 03:54 PM
Thank you for the clarification. I still don't see a need however for the registering and electronics. I've gone to Fallston's dog park. It is open to anyone. People as well as dogs were enjoying time to meet and greet. That would seem to help monitor usage when people and animals get to know each other. And again, it builds community spirit just like rec council sports.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »