.
Feedback

Laurel’s Annexation Plan Draws Concerns of Residents

Patuxent Green residents say they were shut out of process.

A plan for the City of Laurel to annex a small plot of land that includes a church is drawing criticism from a resident community that says it has been shut out of the process.

During last night’s Laurel Council meeting, city officials moved closer to voting on a resolution that would allow the city to annex more than four acres near the intersection of Cherry Lane and Route 197, where the sits. The annexation would allow the church to reclassify a land zoning designation for a small patch of wooded area adjacent to the church.

But residents from the Village at The Greens of the Patuxent, a roughly 132 single-family home community that abuts the church property, are pushing the Council to slow down on the rezoning to give them a chance to give input. Residents contend they were not told about the annexation and are concerned the church could redevelop the wooded area nearest the community’s homes.

“The [homeowners’ board] received no notice,” said Robert McGuire, secretary of the community’s association. “We’re concerned about the implications of the annexation.”

McGuire said that he and other residents fear the land could be developed into anything from housing units to a parking lot.

“Is it going to help our property value or hurt it?” he asked.

Representatives from the church petitioned to have the property annexed by the city. According to the Laurel Leader, church officials said the annexation would allow them to be on the same page as the community because it services the city.

Still, the church is exploring options on how to develop the parcel of wooded land—though no decision has been reached.

The Laurel Council will hold another public hearing on July 23 on the annexation. A decision could be reached as soon as Sept. 10.

Dana Schwartz July 11, 2012 at 12:01 am
This community is called "Patuxent Glen", not "Village at The Greens of the Patuxent".
John S July 12, 2012 at 08:02 pm
http://www.cityoflaurel.org/meeting/2012/06/18/thirteenth-meeting-mayor-and-city-council
Here is the agenda list for the meeting on Monday July 9, 2012. It looks like two annexation proposals were discussed. This clears up my initial confusion when reading this July 10, 2012 Patch story. The Laurel Leader has two stories for each proposal covered in the July 9, 2012 meeting: http://www.baltimoresun.com/explore/howard/news/community/ph-ll-citybriefs-council-misc-20120710,0,662054.story The above link is on the Patuxent Greens resident concerns as presented in this Patch story. http://www.baltimoresun.com/explore/howard/news/community/ph-ll-citybriefs-annexation-20120710,0,5338196.story The above link is to the story on the proposed annexation of land described as follows: "The land up for annexation lies between I-95 and the Mayfair neighborhood along Contee Road. The parcel will be bordered to the south by the State Highway Administration's development of the third segment of the Intercounty Connector, which is currently occupied by Van Dusen Road."

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Laurel Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something